Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Proofreading Service - Pain in the English
Proofreading Service - Pain in the English

Your Pain Is Our Pleasure

24-Hour Proofreading Service—We proofread your Google Docs or Microsoft Word files. We hate grammatical errors with a passion. Learn More

Username

Skeeter Lewis

Member Since

March 16, 2012

Total number of comments

165

Total number of votes received

210

Bio

Latest Comments

You’ve got another think/thing coming

  • April 13, 2013, 12:49am

I'm an older person and I've only heard the 'think' version. 'Thing' is a mis-hearing.

Apostrophes

  • April 11, 2013, 2:19pm

Very well researched, Will. I concede defeat.

Orally Aural. Oh Really?

  • April 11, 2013, 8:52am

Robert: yes, there are many regional accents but I was assuming standard pronunciation for both the UK and US.
As for 'owrally' I was imagining a rhyme with 'cow' (see palaceuk) but even a rhyme with 'blow' would be odd.
Perhaps Aussies could clarify.

Orally Aural. Oh Really?

  • April 11, 2013, 1:29am

We British pronounce them the same. Americans say 'au' differently from us. To a Brit the American 'au' sounds like 'ah'.
The Australian 'owrally' is impossible...

Apostrophes

  • April 11, 2013, 12:51am

Thanks, Erin, for that post. I wondered where you lived.
I guessed that you had succumbed to the American language when I saw a capital after a colon. (Just kidding.)
To me, 'Jane and John' is not a noun phrase. They are just John and Jane. Americans are at liberty to make changes to their form of the language so long as they don't then claim it to be 'standard usage'.
Of course you're right about the language changing. Dr. Johnson said it best in the preface to his Dictionary:

"...to enchain syllables, and to lash the wind, are equally the undertakings of pride, unwilling to measure its desires by its strength."

That doesn't mean there can't be a spirited debate. It's true, of course, that King Canute is my role model....

Apostrophes

  • April 10, 2013, 4:59pm

Re: 'Jane and John's house.'
If this is standard usage, it must be of recent date. It sounds barbarous to me.

If there is an example of a reputable British author using this form more than say thirty years ago,,,,,,I would be intrigued.

Apostrophes

  • April 9, 2013, 11:37am

Erin - a couple of suggestions.
One can't say 'me and my sisters' childhood' because that means you are saying 'me childhood'. Also I go by the rule that it is polite to put oneself last. 'My sisters' childhood and mine.'
As to Jack and Jill's house - well, that is becoming modern usage. In the past, you could use one apostrophe for a company, for example Marks and Spencer's. There, one apostrophe does duty for both. But individuals need two. Otherwise one has this sort of confusion:

"I met Anne and Joe's aunt at the airport."

How many people did I meet? One or two? Please! Separate apostrophes!

Adverbs better avoided?

  • April 1, 2013, 2:10am

Some writers aim for a stripped-down style. Others like to enjoy the richness of the language.
I'd say that it's not about adverbs per se.

“ton” in the Victorian era

  • March 29, 2013, 3:41pm

"Must not head mobs?"
Will - what does that mean?

“further” vs. “farther”

  • March 29, 2013, 3:30pm

In British English both words are used. I wouldn't say that 'farther' is seen as old-fashioned.

Questions

Medicine or Medication? October 27, 2012
What’s happening to the Passive? July 30, 2014
The 1900s June 11, 2015